Footnotes (67)



Doubting Daubert

Lisa Heinzerling

Georgetown University Law Center

Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 784689
Brooklyn Journal of Law and Policy, Forthcoming

In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the Supreme Court announced that it was liberalizing the rules on admissibility of expert scientific evidence by rejecting a requirement that such evidence be generally accepted in the scientific community. "Daubert" has had just the opposite effect from the one the Court said it intended: it has narrowed rather than enlarged the range of expert evidence admitted by courts, and it has ushered in a whole suit of unscientific legal rulings in the process. Proposals to extend "Daubert" to the administrative setting should be rejected, and the courts should pull back from "Daubert" itself.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: Daubert, torts, environmental law, administrative law, rules of evidence, expert evidence, scientific method, junk science

JEL Classification: D82, K33, K14

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 19, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Heinzerling, Lisa, Doubting Daubert. Brooklyn Journal of Law and Policy, Forthcoming; Brooklyn Journal of Law and Policy, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=784689

Contact Information

Lisa Heinzerling (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,176
Downloads: 347
Download Rank: 58,455
Footnotes:  67

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.329 seconds