How Law Knows in the American Trial Court
Robert P. Burns
Northwestern University - School of Law
HOW LAW KNOWS, Douglas, Sarat, & Umphrey, eds., Stanford University Press
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper
The word "know" has an inevitably normative bite. I can believe that the moon is made of green cheese, but I cannot know it. So the question that forms the title of this essay really contains two questions: (1) What do we do in the trial court? and (2) Does that amount to knowledge? The first question calls for linguistic phenomenology, as Hannah Arendt put it, and the second question for a kind of theorizing that has a long and important history. This essay summarizes that history and then identifies some of the philosophical commitments that would allow us to say that the practical understandings that emerge at trial may fairly be called knowledge.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 19, 2005
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.437 seconds