Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=786286
 
 

Footnotes (56)



 


 



Congress, the Courts, and New Technologies: A Response to Professor Solove


Orin S. Kerr


George Washington University - Law School


Fordham Law Review, Winter 2005
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 154

Abstract:     
Which branch of government should take the leading role in the creation of criminal procedure rules when technology is in flux? In a recent article, The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution, 102 Michigan Law Review 801-888 (2004), Professor Kerr argued that Congress has a relative institutional advantage over the courts in the creation of rules regulating law enforcement investigations that involve new technologies. Professor Daniel Solove disputes that institutional advantage in a symposium essay, Fourth Amendment Codification and Professor Kerr's Misguided Call for Judicial Deference. In this brief response to Solove, Professor Kerr contends that Solove's critique misses the mark in two ways. First, Solove improperly compares a descriptive account of statutory law protections with a normative account of constitutional law protections. Second, Solove fails to appreciate fully the institutional limitations of judicial rulemaking when technology is changing rapidly.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: Fourth Amendment computers

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 24, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Kerr, Orin S., Congress, the Courts, and New Technologies: A Response to Professor Solove. Fordham Law Review, Vol. 74, 2005; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 154. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=786286

Contact Information

Orin S. Kerr (Contact Author)
George Washington University - Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-4775 (Phone)
202-994-9817 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/faculty/profile.asp?ID=3568
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,189
Downloads: 201
Download Rank: 86,461
Footnotes:  56

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.234 seconds