Abstract

 
 

References (32)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Comparing the Value Relevance of R&D Reporting in Germany: Standard and Selection Effects


Fred Ramb


Deutsche Bundesbank, Economics Department, Monetary Policy and Monetary Analysis

Markus G. Reitzig


University of Vienna

August 21, 2005


Abstract:     
On the basis of accounting and market data for firms and groups listed on German stock exchanges between 1997 and 2003, we show that the value relevance of R&D information under German accounting standards can be superior to that provided by US-GAAP and IAS. The results, obtained while dynamically controlling for partial freedom of firms to choose a standard in a modified Q model, show that the risk of IAS/US-GAAP misinforming investors during "bear market" periods is more relevant than their comparative advantage over the prudence principle of the German Commercial Code in "bull market" periods. Using the approach chosen for this study, it is possible not only to draw a clear dividing line between standard and selection effects but also to disentangle them along theoretical lines more clearly than in earlier studies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: Accounting standards, standard selection, research and development (R&D), value relevance, Germany

JEL Classification: G12, D82, M41, M44, M47, K11

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 30, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Ramb, Fred and Reitzig, Markus G., Comparing the Value Relevance of R&D Reporting in Germany: Standard and Selection Effects (August 21, 2005). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=787704 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.787704

Contact Information

Fred Ramb
Deutsche Bundesbank, Economics Department, Monetary Policy and Monetary Analysis ( email )
Wilhelm-Epstein-Str. 14
D-60431 Frankfurt/Main
Germany
++49-69-9566-2809 (Phone)
Markus G. Reitzig (Contact Author)
University of Vienna ( email )
Bruenner Strasse 72
Vienna, 1090
Austria
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,521
Downloads: 313
Download Rank: 45,940
References:  32
Citations:  3

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.391 seconds