Domesticating the Gerrymander: An Essay on Standards, Fair Representation, and the Necessary Question of Judicial Will
Luis E. Fuentes-Rohwer
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
14 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 423 (2005)
IU Law-Bloomington Research Paper No. 39
The U.S. Supreme Court has moved beyond its cautious intervention in Baker v. Carr and now firmly controls the law of democracy. Yet political gerrymandering questions so understood have traditionally proven difficult for the Court to examine properly. The recent Vieth v. Jubelirer is but a further example of this phenomenon. This Essay situates Vieth within the reapportionment revolution and ultimately concludes that the central question in gerrymandering cases is the question of judicial will and whether the Court will choose to exercise its power. This Essay closes with a cautionary note: in light of the Court's general performance in the field of democracy and its propensity to wield its power in accordance with its idiosyncratic views of the political process and the maladies that corrupt it, do we really want the Court doing our bidding?
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21
Keywords: law of democracy, gerrymandering, political questions, judicial review
Date posted: August 25, 2005 ; Last revised: June 14, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds