Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=788564
 
 

References (34)



 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Harnessing Adversarial Process: Optimal Strategic Complementarities in Litigation


Chris William Sanchirico


University of Pennsylvania Law School; University of Pennsylvania Wharton School - Business Economics and Public Policy Department

February 2005

U of Penn, Inst. for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 05-01
NYU, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 05-15

Abstract:     
This paper studies the evidence production game in adversarial litigation, wherein litigating parties choose how much to spend amassing evidence for their side. The payoff structure of this game is such that one party strategically complements (i.e. mimics her opponent's advances and retreats) while the other strategically substitutes (i.e., does the opposite of her opponent). Which party plays which role depends on how litigation is structured. The question thus arises: should litigation be designed to induce the plaintiff to complement and the defendant to substitute, or vice versa? The paper argues that the answer depends on whether and whose primary activity incentives are being set by the particular evidentiary contest in question. Within each subsidiary evidentiary contest, the "incentive target" should be induced to complement and her adversary to substitute. In some cases the defendant will be the incentive target, as when the issue is the defendant's negligence or contractual breach. In other cases, the plaintiff will be the target, as when the defendant defends by claiming that the plaintiff has been "contributorily negligent" or has herself failed to meet a prior contractual obligation. These results resonate with current law. (A companion paper A Primary Activity Approach to Proof Burdens applies these results to the problem of allocating the burden of proof.)

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: Evidence, procedure, litigation, adversarial process, strategic complementarities, burden of proof, contributory negligence

JEL Classification: K4, K40, K41, K12, K13, D82

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 4, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Sanchirico, Chris William, Harnessing Adversarial Process: Optimal Strategic Complementarities in Litigation (February 2005). U of Penn, Inst. for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 05-01; NYU, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 05-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=788564 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.661166

Contact Information

Chris William Sanchirico (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-4220 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.upenn.edu/faculty/csanchir/
University of Pennsylvania Wharton School - Business Economics and Public Policy Department
3641 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6372
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,001
Downloads: 205
Download Rank: 84,730
References:  34
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds