SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (266)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Invisible Settlements, Invisible Discrimination

Minna J. Kotkin
Brooklyn Law School



North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 84, 2006
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 39

Abstract:     
Invisible settlements make discrimination in the workplace invisible. Now the norm in employment discrimination litigation, these settlements resolve actions through private contractual agreements with confidentiality clauses that prohibit the plaintiff and her attorney from revealing not only the payment amount, but even the existence of and the facts surrounding the underlying claim. The court record indicates only that the action was dismissed by stipulation, for which no judicial approval is required. Successful outcomes for discrimination victims are shielded from judicial and public attention, lending credence to claims that discrimination in the workplace largely has been eradicated.

Invisibility defeats the intent of the discrimination statutes, skews empirical studies of discrimination litigation, which inform the public debate about the prevalence of bias, and hampers lawyers' ability to counsel and negotiate on behalf of discrimination claimants. The roots of invisibility can be traced to an increasingly privatized model of statutory enforcement, which ignores the deterrence function of public resolutions.

Increased transparency could be achieved by any of the following means. First, the EEOC, which requires a public record of settlements in litigation that it brings, could follow the lead of the United States Department of Labor, which by regulation insists on agency or judicial approval of settlements under the worker protection statutes that it administers. Second, the civil rights bar could take a stand against secrecy, as the personal injury bar has done, and gain agreement from clients in advance to reject settlements that require confidentiality. Finally, at the very least, the courts could require submission of the specific terms of stipulated dismissals, without party identification, so that aggregate data about the nature and extent of settlements in civil rights litigation could be publicly available.

Keywords: employment discrimination, civil rights, settlement

JEL Classifications: K31, K41

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: August 25, 2005 ; Last revised: September 23, 2005

Suggested Citation

Kotkin, Minna J., Invisible Settlements, Invisible Discrimination. North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 84, 2006 ; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 39. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=789605


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Minna J. Kotkin (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,828
Downloads: 114
Download Rank: 71,279
Footnotes: 266

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.203 seconds.