Repression and Denial in Criminal Lawyering
Susan A. Bandes
DePaul University - College of Law
Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, February 2006
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 789764
NYLS Clinical Research Institute Paper No. 09/10 #16
Legal scholars as well as laypeople are fascinated by the question of how criminal lawyers can defend people accused of heinous crimes. This topic is commonly addressed as part of a well-established discourse about the morality and ethics of criminal defense. A separate conversation needs to occur. Its topic is how, in an emotional sense, one defends people accused of terrible crimes, and what toll such defense takes, both professionally and personally. This article first explores the defense mechanisms employed by criminal defense lawyers, and how these mechanisms affect lawyers both as advocates and as people whose work is comfortably integrated into their lives. Second, it suggests that the mechanisms and strategies discussed are not unique to defense attorneys, but are common in legal practice generally. Finally, it argues that the legal profession needs to overcome its aversion to acknowledging and addressing the emotional aspects of lawyering, and suggests some possible paths toward this goal.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 53
Keywords: Criminal law, legal profession, psychology, emotion and lawAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 26, 2005
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.468 seconds