Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=794552
 
 

Footnotes (19)



 


 



Rev. Proc. 2005-24 and the UPC Elective Share


Lawrence W. Waggoner


University of Michigan Law School

August 2005

Michigan Law and Economics Research Paper No. 05-009

Abstract:     
This article discusses Revenue Procedure 2005-24, which came as a bombshell to the estate-planning bar. The Rev. Proc. requires a spousal waiver of elective-share rights in order for a charitable remainder annuity trust (CRAT) or a charitable remainder unitrust (CRUT) created on or after June 28, 2005, to qualify for a charitable deduction. The elective share is a statutory provision common to most probate codes in non-community-property states that protect a decedent's surviving spouse against disinheritance.

The Rev. Proc. is primarily though apparently not exclusively addressed to the elective share of the Uniform Probate Code (UPC). Unfortunately, the Rev. Proc. applies applicable state law that is sometimes consistent with and sometimes significantly departs from the UPC elective share, without identifying which is which. Consequently, the Rev. Proc. may give the wrong impression that the UPC served as the model for the applicable state law throughout the discussion and examples.

The source of the problem appears to be that the IRS misinterpreted the UPC elective share. The IRS's description of the UPC elective share overlooks an important feature of that law: Under UPC elective-share law, the settlor-decedent's surviving spouse has no claim on a premarital CRAT or CRUT - a CRAT or CRUT created when the settlor-decedent was unmarried or was married to a previous spouse. Consequently, no spousal waiver should be required of a later spouse if the UPC is the applicable state law. Yet, the Rev. Proc. repeatedly states that a waiver is required of a later spouse.

The article concludes by pointing out that there is a larger question posed by the Rev. Proc., which is that if the IRS remains determined to insist on a spousal waiver for CRATs and CRUTs that might but probably won't turn out to be liable for a pro rata share of an electing surviving spouse, the result may be to weaken the elective-share protection for surviving spouses. The article urges the IRS to drop the requirement of a spousal waiver and work out some mechanism for retroactively denying the charitable deduction only in cases in which the surviving spouse actually claims his or her elective-share rights and the CRAT or CRUT becomes liable for satisfying a portion of those rights. This is in fact the IRS's position regarding CRATs and CRUTs created before June 28, 2005, and would seem to be all that is necessary to protect tax revenues.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: Wills, Trusts and Estates, Property, Tax Policy, Family Law, Law & Economics

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 6, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Waggoner, Lawrence W., Rev. Proc. 2005-24 and the UPC Elective Share (August 2005). Michigan Law and Economics Research Paper No. 05-009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=794552 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.794552

Contact Information

Lawrence W. Waggoner (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,392
Downloads: 69
Download Rank: 201,041
Footnotes:  19

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.437 seconds