Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=799144
 
 

Footnotes (146)



 


 



The Dividend Problem: Are Shareholders Entitled to the Residual


Daniel J.H. Greenwood


Hofstra University College of Law


Utah Legal Studies Paper No. 05-10
Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2006

Abstract:     
Using the familiar economic model of the firm, I show that shareholders have no special claim on a corporation's economic returns. No one has an entitlement to economic rents in a capitalist system. Shareholders, the purely fungible providers of a purely fungible commodity, are particularly unlikely to be able to command a share of economic profits. Indeed, since the contribution of shareholders to the firm is a sunk cost, in a competitive market shareholders are unlikely to earn any return at all. Accordingly, market-based analyses of the firm should conclude that shareholder returns result from a market distortion. Similarly, black-letter legal doctrine makes clear that shareholders are not owners or principals and have no legal claim on corporate assets.

The implications are clear: shareholders win much of the corporate surplus not by market right or moral entitlement, but due to a (possibly temporary) ideological victory in a political battle over economic rents. Surprisingly, since corporate law often assumes a conflict between shareholders and top management, shareholder gains are more likely the result of the usefulness of the share-centered ideologies in justifying a tremendous shift of corporate wealth from employees to an alliance of top managers and shareholders.

Standard accounts conceal the struggles over corporate surplus and the weakness of shareholder claims to appropriate it. Taking the political nature of the corporation seriously, in contrast, will lead to a series of new and important questions. Why should only one side in a political conflict have the vote, and why should a democracy allocate votes per dollar instead of per person?

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: shareholders, corporate governance, rents, shareholder supremacy

JEL Classification: D22, D33, D72, G12, G34, J58, J38, K22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 21, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Greenwood, Daniel J.H., The Dividend Problem: Are Shareholders Entitled to the Residual. Utah Legal Studies Paper No. 05-10; Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2006 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=799144

Contact Information

Daniel J.H. Greenwood (Contact Author)
Hofstra University College of Law ( email )
121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States
516-463-7013 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.hofstra.edu/greenwood

Hofstra University Logo

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,090
Downloads: 711
Download Rank: 18,435
Footnotes:  146

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.390 seconds