|
||||
|
||||
Chinese Poverty: Assessing the Impact of Alternative Assumptions
Camelia Minoiu International Monetary Fund (IMF) Sanjay G. Reddy Columbia University - Barnard College - Department of Economics; Columbia University - School of International & Public Affairs (SIPA); Columbia University - Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy June 30, 2008 Review of Income and Wealth, Forthcoming Abstract: This paper investigates how estimates of the extent and trend of consumption poverty in China between 1990 and 2004 vary as a result of alternative plausible assumptions concerning the poverty line and estimated levels of consumption. Our methodology focuses on the following sources of variation: purchasing power exchange rates (used to convert an international poverty line), alternative levels and distributions of private incomes, alternative estimates of the propensity to consume of different income groups, and alternative spatial and temporal price indices. We report national, urban and rural poverty estimates corresponding to distinct assumptions. It is widely believed that substantial poverty reduction took place in China in the 1990s, and we find this conclusion to be largely robust to the choice of assumptions, although estimates of the extent of Chinese poverty, and therefore of world poverty, in any year are greatly influenced by this choice.
Keywords: consumption poverty, China, sensitivity analysis, urban poverty, rural poverty, world poverty JEL Classifications: I32, D31 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: September 15, 2005 ; Last revised: September 02, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.578 seconds.