Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=801964
 
 

Citations (18)



 
 

Footnotes (131)



 


 



Fear of Democracy: A Cultural Evaluation of Sunstein on Risk


Dan M. Kahan


Yale University - Law School; Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics

Paul Slovic


Decision Research; University of Oregon - Department of Psychology

Donald Braman


George Washington University - Law School; Cultural Cognition Project

John Gastil


Pennsylvania State University


Harvard Law Review, Vol. 119, 2006
Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 100
Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 317

Abstract:     
What dynamics shape public risk perceptions? What significance should such perceptions have in the formation of risk regulation? In Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (2005), Cass Sunstein catalogs a variety of cognitive and social mechanisms that he argues inflate public estimations of various societal risks. To counter the impact of irrational public fears, he advocates delegation of authority to politically insulated experts using economic cost-benefit analysis. Missing from Sunstein's impressive account, however, is any attention to the impact of cultural cognition, the tendency of individuals to form risk perceptions that reflect and reinforce their cultural worldviews. Relying on existing and original empirical research, we use this dynamic to develop an alternative cultural evaluator model, which better explains individual variation in risk perception, differences of opinions among experts, and the intensity of political conflict over risk than does Sunstein's irrational weigher model. Cultural cognition also complicates Sunstein's policy prescriptions. Because the public fears that Sunstein describes as irrational express cultural values, expert cost-benefit analysis does not merely insulate the law from factual error, as Sunstein argues; rather, it systematically detaches law from popular understandings of the ideal society. Indeed, the best defense of Sunstein's program might be just that: by eliding the role that risk regulation plays in endorsing contested cultural visions, expert cost-benefit analysis protects the law from a divisive and deeply illiberal form of expressive politics. The difficult task for those who understand the phenomenon of cultural cognition and who favor democratic modes of policymaking is to devise procedures that assure that popularly responsive risk regulation is both rational and respectful of diverse cultural worldviews.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 12, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Kahan, Dan M. and Slovic, Paul and Braman, Donald and Gastil, John, Fear of Democracy: A Cultural Evaluation of Sunstein on Risk. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 119, 2006; Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 100; Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 317. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=801964

Contact Information

Dan M. Kahan (Contact Author)
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.culturalcognition.net/kahan
Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics ( email )
124 Mount Auburn Street
Suite 520N
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Paul Slovic
Decision Research ( email )
1201 Oak Street, Suite 200
Eugene, OR 97401
United States
541-485-2400 (Phone)
541-485-2403 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.decisionresearch.org
University of Oregon - Department of Psychology ( email )
Eugene, OR 97403
United States
541-485-2400 (Phone)
Donald Braman
George Washington University - Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
Cultural Cognition Project ( email )
2000 H St NW
2000 H Street
Washington, DC 20052 20052
United States
202-491-8843 (Phone)
202 491-8843 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.culturalcognition.net/braman
John Gastil
Pennsylvania State University ( email )
University Park, PA 16802
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 7,299
Downloads: 1,412
Download Rank: 6,299
Citations:  18
Footnotes:  131

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds