|
||||
|
||||
Peer and Partner Review: A Practical Approach to Achieving the MDGs
Antoine Heuty United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Sanjay G. Reddy Columbia University - Barnard College - Department of Economics; Columbia University - School of International & Public Affairs (SIPA); Columbia University - Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy Journal of Human Development, November 2005 Abstract: A number of strategies to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and associated cost estimates have recently been presented, most influentially by the Millennium Project and the World Bank. The models underlying the recommended strategies are flawed, as a result of their reliance on implausible and restrictive assumptions and poor quality data and their failure adequately to reflect uncertainties about the future. These weaknesses of technocratic predictive models can be mitigated but not overcome. An alternative approach to strategic planning should establish an institutional framework for continuous informed policy choice by representative decision-makers. The alternative approach to achieving the MDGs can be implemented through a process of periodic peer and partner review. The process of peer and partner review would enable each country to learn from its own experience and that of other countries and thereby increases the likelihood of success of achieving the MDGs.
Keywords: Poverty, Development, Millennium Development Goals JEL Classifications: O12, O19, O21, E19, E61, E62, E63 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 22, 2005 ; Last revised: September 22, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo 7 in 0.218 seconds.