  |
|
|
||||
|
||||
A Comparison of Models Describing the Impact of Moral Decision Making on Investment Decisions
Eva B. Hofmann University of Vienna - Department of Psychology Erik Hoelzl University of Vienna - Department of Psychology Erich Kirchler University of Vienna - Department of Psychology August 30, 2005 Abstract: Some rational decision theorists argue that moral considerations would introduce inefficiency to investment decisions. However, market demand for socially responsible investment is increasing. We test the suitability of (a) multiple attribute utility theory, (b) theory of planned behavior, and (c) issue-contingent model of ethical decision making in organizations to explain socially responsible investment behavior. In an experimental setting, 141 participants traded company shares on a computerized asset market. Over 12 periods, companies varied in morality and in profitability. Participants' bids and asks for shares were recorded. Results indicate that moral considerations influence investment decisions, controlling for profit. Differences between the three models are discussed.
Keywords: ethics, decision theory, behavioral finance JEL Classifications: D14, G11, M14 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: September 20, 2005 ; Last revised: September 20, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apolloc 6 in 0.250 seconds.
One-Click Download
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
Del.icio.us
CiteULike
