Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=805088
 


 



The Error of Expected Loss Minimization


Ronald J. Allen


Northwestern University Law School


Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 2, pp. 1-7, 2003

Abstract:     
Considerable effort has been expended by legal scholars attempting to apply formal approaches such as Bayes' Theorem or decision theory to various aspects of the litigation process. These efforts consistently fail adequately to account for the reality of the phenomenon being investigated. Most recently, Professor Kaye attempted to give another decision-theoretic account of the standard of persuasion in civil cases. This attempt fails formally, as it requires that litigation involve single issues for decision, which is virtually never the case. It fails pragmatically because it ignores all the surrounding context of the decision rule that colours and gives meaning to the decision rule. Jury trials cannot plausibly be analysed as designed to maximize the expected return to jurors.

Keywords: burden of persuasion, decision theory, expected utility, errors in litigation, equality, jury trials, algorithms, formalisms, formal reasoning

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: February 29, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Allen, Ronald J., The Error of Expected Loss Minimization. Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 2, pp. 1-7, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=805088

Contact Information

Ronald Jay Allen (Contact Author)
Northwestern University Law School ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-8372 (Phone)
312-503-2035 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 437

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds