Citations (1)


Footnotes (74)



Due Process and En Banc Decision Making

Michael E. Solimine

University of Cincinnati - College of Law

Arizona Law Review, Vol. 48, 2005
U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 05-21

Several en banc decisions from the Ninth Circuit, and other circuits, raise issues regarding the institutional processes by which the circuits rehear panel decisions en banc, and whether and to what extent these processes should be more transparent. This article critically examines these issues, on which judges have taken a variety of divergent positions. First is whether the vote tallies of the circuit on motions to rehear panel decisions should be made public. Second is when, if ever, judges should publish opinions concurring in or dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, as well as the appropriate content of those opinions. The third issue is whether the likelihood of Supreme Court review of a case should influence a circuit in deciding to rehear a panel decision en banc. Several Ninth Circuit cases will serve as the focal point, though not the exclusive one, of the discussion of these issues.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: En Banc, Institutional Processes, Circuit Decisions

JEL Classification: K40, K49

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 24, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Solimine, Michael E., Due Process and En Banc Decision Making. Arizona Law Review, Vol. 48, 2005; U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 05-21. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=809464

Contact Information

Michael E. Solimine (Contact Author)
University of Cincinnati - College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210040
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040
United States
513-556-0102 (Phone)
513-556-1236 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,535
Downloads: 93
Download Rank: 210,798
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  74

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds