|
||||
|
||||
'Pretend-Y Rights.' on the Insanely Complicated New Regime for Performers' Rights in Australia, and How Australian Performers Got Gypped
Kimberlee G. Weatherall The University of Queensland - T.C. Beirne School of Law U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 127 NEW DIRECTIONS IN COPYRIGHT LAW, Vol. II Edward Elgar Press, Forthcoming Abstract: From 1 January 2005, over eight years after the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT) was concluded, and not far shy of 10 years after performers obtained economic and moral rights in the UK, Australia was finally dragged kicking and screaming to the performers' rights party. Although the issue had long been on the government's copyright agenda, the final impetus for the adoption of performers' moral and economic rights was not a local policy decision but a provision of the Free Trade Agreement between Australia and the United States of America ('AUSFTA'). It is perhaps significant that the aim of promoting performers' interests appears in neither the Explanatory Memorandum nor the Second Reading Speech of the legislation which implemented that treaty.
Keywords: performers' rights, free trade agreement, moral rights, Australia JEL Classifications: K1, K11, K19 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 22, 2005 ; Last revised: June 10, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds.