|
||||
|
||||
The Stability Pact Pains: A Forward-Looking Assessment of the Reform DebateMarco ButiEuropean Commission, DG II Sylvester C. W. EijffingerTilburg University (CentER) - Department of Economics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Daniele FrancoBank of Italy August 2005 CentER Discussion Paper No. 2005-101 Abstract: The Stability and Growth Pact has been under fire ever since it was born. But is the Pact a flawed fiscal rule? Against established criteria for an ideal fiscal rule, its design and compliance mechanisms show strengths and weaknesses. The latter tend to reflect tradeoffs typical of supra-national arrangements. In the end, only a higher degree of fiscal integration would remove the inflexibility inherent in the recourse to predefined budgetary rules. No alternative solution put forward in the literature appears clearly superior. This does not mean that the original Pact of 1997 could not be improved. The debate on the SGP has shown that any reform should aim at overcoming the excessive uniformity of the rules, improving their transparency, correcting pro-cyclicality and strengthening enforcement. The reform of the Pact agreed in 2005 moves in this direction but leaves open a number of issues.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31 Keywords: EMS, fiscal policy, fiscal rules, Economic and Monetary Union, Stability and Growth Pact JEL Classification: E61, H3, H6, H7 working papers seriesDate posted: October 2, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.906 seconds