The Fair Value of Cornfields in Delaware Appraisal Law
Lawrence A. Hamermesh
Widener University School of Law
Michael L. Wachter
University of Pennsylvania Law School - Institute for Law and Economics
Delaware Journal of Corporate Law (DJCL), Vol. 31, Pg. 119, 2005
U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 05-24
The Delaware Supreme Court's opinions in Weinberger and Technicolor have left a troublesome uncertainty in defining the proper approach to the valuation of corporate shares. That uncertainty - increasingly important as going private mergers become more frequent - can be resolved by a blend of financial and doctrinal analysis. The primary problem - the potential opportunism by controlling shareholders in timing going private mergers - can be addressed by a more complete understanding of corporate finance. The definition of fair value must include not only the present value of the firm's existing assets, but also the future opportunities to reinvest free cash flow, including reinvestment opportunities identified, even if not yet developed, before the merger. This issue has been incompletely articulated by the courts. On the other hand, value created by the merger that can only be achieved by means of the merger itself - such as reduced costs of public company compliance - should not be included in determining fair value. We also show that except in the case of acquisitions by third parties (where actual sale value, minus synergies, is a useful measure of fair value), hypothetical third party sale value does not and should not ordinarily be taken as a measure of fair value.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: Delaware appraisal law, corporate finance, valuationworking papers series
Date posted: November 30, 2005 ; Last revised: May 13, 2009
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.484 seconds