Leasing, Ability to Repossess, and Debt Capacity
Andrea L. Eisfeldt
UCLA Anderson School of Management
Adriano A. Rampini
Duke University; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
AFA 2007 Chicago Meetings Paper
US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-07-19
EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings
This paper studies the financing role of leasing and secured lending. We argue that the benefit of leasing is that repossession of a leased asset is easier than foreclosure on the collateral of a secured loan, which implies that leasing has higher debt capacity than secured lending. However, leasing involves agency costs due to the separation of ownership and control. More financially constrained firms value the additional debt capacity more and hence lease more of their capital than less constrained firms. We provide empirical evidence consistent with this prediction. Our theory is consistent with the explanation of leasing by practitioners, namely that leasing "preserves capital," which the academic literature considers a fallacy.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: Leasing, secured debt, collateral, repossession, debt capacity, capital
JEL Classification: D23, D92, E22, G31, G32, G33
Date posted: October 3, 2005
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds