Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=813145
 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Possession in Patent Law


Timothy R. Holbrook


Emory University School of Law


SMU Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 1

Abstract:     
Every patent system in the world requires an inventor to disclose his invention in the patent document. The courts rationalize this obligation as part of the quid pro quo of the patent system: the patentee must disclose the invention to the public in exchange for the patent's exclusive rights. The patent thus teaches the world about this new creation and enhances the storehouse of knowledge. The quid pro quo view of the patent system, however, is inconsistent with the theoretical justifications for patent law. Patents are meant to combat free-riding, yet this view of the patent as "teaching" the invention is based on the view that free-riding is normatively good. This article explains this apparent inconsistency by recognizing that the teaching function is not the primary purpose for disclosure. Instead, the purpose of disclosure, and specifically the manner of making the invention, is to demonstrate that the inventor was in possession of the invention. This shift in perspective from "teaching" to "possession" reconciles patent theory with the disclosure obligations and also provides significant normative power in explaining how patent law could work more effectively.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Keywords: Patent, enablement, written description, doctrine of equivalents, prosecution history estoppel, claim construction, public dedication, obviousness, possession

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 11, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Holbrook, Timothy R., Possession in Patent Law. SMU Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 1. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=813145

Contact Information

Timothy Richard Holbrook (Contact Author)
Emory University School of Law ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-712-0353 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,900
Downloads: 328
Download Rank: 50,670
Citations:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.687 seconds