Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=813307
 
 

Footnotes (270)



 


 



State of Mind: The Hillmon Case, the McGuffin, and the Supreme Court


Marianne Mimi Wesson


University of Colorado Law School


U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-09

Abstract:     
The case of Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Hillmon is one of the most influential decisions in the law of evidence. Decided by the Supreme Court in 1892, it invented an exception to the hearsay rule for statements encompassing the intentions of the declarant. But this exception seems not to rest on any plausible theory of the categorical reliability of such statements. This article suggests that the case turned instead on the Court's understanding of the facts of the underlying dispute about the identity of a corpse. The author's investigations into newspaper archives and the original case documents point to a different understanding, and proposes that this important rule of evidence may have grown out of an historical mistake.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 75

Keywords: Evidence, Legal History, Law and Literature

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 9, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Wesson, Marianne Mimi, State of Mind: The Hillmon Case, the McGuffin, and the Supreme Court. U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-09. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=813307 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.813307

Contact Information

Marianne Mimi Wesson (Contact Author)
University of Colorado Law School ( email )
401 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,601
Downloads: 154
Download Rank: 107,704
Footnotes:  270

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.437 seconds