Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=813726
 
 

References (22)



 
 

Citations (11)



 


 



An Inconsistency in SEC Disclosure Requirements? The Case of the 'Insignificant' Private Target


Usha Rodrigues


University of Georgia Law School

Mike Stegemoller


Baylor University

August 2006


Abstract:     
Although the SEC's main charge is to ensure the disclosure of material information, the SEC has not always consistently defined materiality. We show that acquisitions of privately-held targets classified as "insignificant" by the SEC appreciably affect market prices, and therefore are "material" by the SEC's definition. We find significant returns in transactions with targets as small as 2% -- compared with the SEC's disclosure threshold of 20% -- of the acquirer. Further, an average of 19 undisclosed private acquisitions per year exceed the median IPO value in the same year for our sample period. However, because the SEC deems these transactions insignificant, information like target financial statements remains undisclosed to the market. Disclosure rules regarding target financial statements thus create a regulatory disconnect, in which information that is "material" is "insignificant" and therefore not disclosed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: Takeover, SEC, disclosure, acquisition, merger

JEL Classification: G34, G38

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 10, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Rodrigues, Usha and Stegemoller, Mike, An Inconsistency in SEC Disclosure Requirements? The Case of the 'Insignificant' Private Target (August 2006). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=813726 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.813726

Contact Information

Usha Rodrigues
University of Georgia Law School ( email )
Athens, GA 30602
United States
706-242-5562 (Phone)

Michael A. Stegemoller (Contact Author)
Baylor University ( email )
P.O. Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798-8004
United States
254-710-4145 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,728
Downloads: 216
Download Rank: 82,508
References:  22
Citations:  11

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.282 seconds