Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=815245
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (32)



 


 



Legislative Usurpation: The Early Practice and Constitutional Repudiation of Legislative Intervention in Adjudication


David Kairys


Temple University - Beasley School of Law


University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 945-950, 2005

Abstract:     
In the United States, we usually think of separation of powers as easy and obvious. Legislatures make rules of general application; courts decide cases between parties based on existing law; and executives enforce and implement the laws. Sometimes the lines shift or get fuzzy, but the principle was fundamental to the framers of the Constitution and still has the feel and supporting authority of a foundational precept. However, this was not always so. In the pre-constitutional history of the United States, legislatures regularly exercised judicial functions, intervened in adjudication, and interfered with accrued or vested rights. Congress seems poised to test the basic principle once again with a bill that bars the pending city lawsuits and most other litigation against handgun manufacturers and dealers. This short historical essay addresses the early practice of legislative intervention in litigation and its repudiation by the framers of the Constitution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: Separation of powers, legislative usurpation, legislative intervention in adjudication, legislative power, gun litigation

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 11, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Kairys, David, Legislative Usurpation: The Early Practice and Constitutional Repudiation of Legislative Intervention in Adjudication. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 945-950, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=815245

Contact Information

David Kairys (Contact Author)
Temple University - Beasley School of Law ( email )
1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,494
Downloads: 121
Download Rank: 140,555
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  32

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.282 seconds