Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=821680
 
 

Citations



 


 



James Barr Ames and the Early Modern History of Unjust Enrichment


Andrew Kull


Boston University - Pappas Law Library

2005

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 297-319, 2005

Abstract:     
The modern conception of unjust enrichment as a source of private obligation, and as the basis of today`s law of restitution, is usually traced to the American Law Institute`s Restatement of Restitution (1937). But the Restatement`s most significant innovation-its unified treatment of law and equity, presenting quasi-contract and constructive trust as alternative responses to the problem of unjust enrichment-merely put the ALI imprimatur on discoveries announced some fifty years earlier by James Barr Ames of the Harvard Law School. Ames`s propositions about unjust enrichment had found steadily increasing acceptance in the intervening decades, and by the time the Restatement was drafted they represented American academic orthodoxy. The law of restitution has been notoriously slow in developing, but its modern era is approximately half a century older than is generally supposed.

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: February 29, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Kull, Andrew, James Barr Ames and the Early Modern History of Unjust Enrichment ( 2005). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 25, Issue 2, pp. 297-319, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=821680

Contact Information

Andrew Kull (Contact Author)
Boston University - Pappas Law Library ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 770

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds