|
||||
|
||||
The Choice of the Agenda in Labor Negotiations: Efficiency and Behavioral ConsiderationsManfred KönigsteinUniversity of Erfurt; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Marie-Claire VillevalNational Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) - Institute of Economic Theory and Analysis (GATE); Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) September 2005 IZA Discussion Paper No. 1762 GATE Working Paper No. 05-08 Abstract: The labor economics literature has shown that the "efficient bargaining" model, in which wage and employment are negotiated simultaneously, is less frequently used on unionized markets than the less efficient "right-to-manage" model, in which wage is determined via bargaining and employment determined subsequently and unilaterally by the firm. This paper reports an experiment in which the choice of the bargaining agenda is endogenous within a noncooperative game. We find that participants show a preference for decision authority and choose single-issue bargaining in most cases even though efficiency is lower than in multi-issue bargaining. Furthermore, multi-issue bargaining induces unions to offer smaller payoff shares and leads to a higher conflict rate than in a single-issue bargaining.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 37 Keywords: bargaining agenda, efficient contracts, right-to-manage, decision authority, experiments JEL Classification: C72, C78, C91, J51, J53 working papers seriesDate posted: October 15, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.344 seconds