Have Gun, Can't Travel: The Right to Arms under the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV
George Mason University School of Law
University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 4, 2005
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 05-34
David Bach is a former Navy SEAL, a commissioned officer in the Naval Reserve, an experienced firearms instructor, and an attorney. He is now employed by the Department of Defense, where he holds a Top Secret security clearance. This model citizen resides in the Commonwealth of Virginia, where he is licensed to carry a concealed weapon.
Bach periodically takes his wife and three young children to upstate New York by car in order to visit his parents. This lengthy journey goes through several high-crime areas in New York, and he wants to carry a defensive firearm on his person, either openly or concealed, in case of a criminal assault during one of these trips. New York issues licenses to carry firearms to its own citizens who meet certain statutory criteria, and to nonresidents who have their principal place of employment or business in the state, but not to visitors like Bach. If he carried his personal weapon with him, he would be committing a felony.
The Second Circuit rejected Bach's claim that New York law violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV. This brief essay argues that Bach's Privileges and Immunities claim is valid, and that the nature of the claim throws an interesting light on a provision of the Constitution whose importance exceeds the amount of attention it has received from the Supreme Court.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
JEL Classification: H11Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 24, 2005
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.421 seconds