New Approaches to Ranking Economics Journals
Yolanda K. Kodrzycki
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston - Research Department
Pingkang David Yu
affiliation not provided to SSRN
FRB Boston Working Paper No. 05-12
We develop a flexible, citations- and reference-intensity-adjusted ranking technique that allows a specified set of journals to be evaluated using a range of alternative criteria. We also distinguish between the influence of a journal and that of a journal article, with the latter concept arguably being more relevant for measuring research productivity. The list of top economics journals can (but does not necessarily) change noticeably when one examines citations in the social science and policy literatures, and when one measures citations on a perarticle basis. The changes in rankings are due to the broad interest in applied microeconomics and economic development, to differences in citation norms and in the relative importance assigned to theoretical and empirical contributions, and to the lack of a systematic effect of journal size on influence per article. We also find that economics is comparatively selfcontained but nevertheless draws knowledge from a range of other disciplines. This paper was revised in August 2006.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: economics journals, social sciences journals, policy journals, rankings, citations, research productivity, interdisciplinary communications
JEL Classification: A10, A12working papers series
Date posted: October 26, 2005
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.485 seconds