SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Analyzing Market Definition and Power in Multi-sided Platform Markets

David S. Evans
University College London; University of Chicago Law School

Michael D. Noel
University of California, San Diego


October 21, 2005


Abstract:     
The SSNIP test and Critical Loss Analysis are widely used tools for determining market definition in merger and sometimes other antitrust matters. However, the standard techniques used to test for a relevant antitrust market are incorrect when the firms in question operate two-sided platforms. When a two-sided platform raises price on one side of its business, it negatively impacts both sides iteratively. We show how Critical Loss Analysis can be extended to the case of two-sided platforms and drive formulas for its implementation. We perform comparative statics to show that the bias from the misuse of one-sided formulas in a two-sided setting can be large.

JEL Classifications: K21, K41, L11, L40, L41

Working Paper Series

Date posted: November 04, 2005 ; Last revised: January 31, 2006

Suggested Citation

Noel, Michael D. and Evans, David S., Analyzing Market Definition and Power in Multi-sided Platform Markets (October 21, 2005). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=835504


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

David S. Evans (Contact Author)
University College London ( email )
London WC1E OEG United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/current/graduate/courses/competition-regulation/economics/index.shtml
University of Chicago Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Michael D. Noel
University of California, San Diego ( email )
9500 Gilman Drive
Mail Code 0502
La Jolla, CA 92093-0502
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,409
Downloads: 526
Download Rank: 13,289

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.094 seconds.