|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper,
please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id837964. ; Size: 406K
|
|
Comparative Law, Asian Law, and Japanese Law
Luke R. Nottage
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law; University of Sydney - Australian Network for Japanese Law
Journal of Japanese Law, Vol. 15, pp. 41-61, 2003
Abstract:
The discipline of comparative law has displayed some renewed vigour after a period of soul-searching, particularly over the last five years. The bulk of much work maintains an excessive focus on black-letter law, but even this has become more relevant to policy-makers, while other comparativists have begun to develop more sophisticated theoretical and empirical insights. These developments create a challenge for Asian law scholarship, which had benefited from the problems afflicting comparative law. Especially for studies of Japanese law, a more encompassing perspective now seems more appropriate.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Keywords: comparative law, Asian law, Japanese law
JEL Classification: K49
Accepted Paper Series
Download This Paper
Date posted: November 10, 2005
Suggested CitationNottage, Luke R., Comparative Law, Asian Law, and Japanese Law. Journal of Japanese Law, Vol. 15, pp. 41-61, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=837964
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
