Kangaroo Court or Competent Tribunal?: Judging the 21st Century Military Commission
David W. Glazier
Loyola Law School Los Angeles
Virginia Law Review, Vol. 89, p. 2005, No. 8, December 2003
President Bush's military commission order, based upon FDR's guidance for the 1942 trial of Nazi saboteurs, authorized procedures departing substantially from court-martial practice. This paper demonstrates the military commission, whose actual origin is traced to the Mexican War in 1847, differed from the statutory court-martial primarily in jurisdiction, not procedure. It argues that Article 36 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice should be read, particularly in light of developments in contemporary international law and the Charming Betsy canon, to require continued commonality between the two tribunals. This argument was substantially adopted by the district court in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 344 F. Supp. 2d 152, 166 n12, 169 n15, 170 n16 (D.D.C. 2004).
Number of Pages in PDF File: 89
Keywords: military commission, UCMJ, international law
JEL Classification: K14, K33Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 7, 2005
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.343 seconds