|
||||
|
||||
Judicial Oversight of Negotiated Sentences in a World of Bargained PunishmentNancy J. KingVanderbilt University - Law School Stanford Law Review, Vol. 58, p. 293, 2005 Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 05-34 Abstract: This article examines parties' ability to circumvent consistency in sentencing by bargaining around the rules that structure sentences within statutory ranges in federal criminal cases. Without careful control by judges, sentencing bargaining carries risks for structured-sentencings systems that may outweigh gains in efficiency. After a discussion of weaknesses in the ability of judges to oversee the factual accuracy of sentencing agreements, the article advances several options that would strengthen that supervisory role, promoting greater accuracy, transparency, and consistency in federal sentencing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17 Keywords: sentencing, stipulations, plea bargaining, guidelines, presentence report, probation officer Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 15, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.610 seconds