SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Constitutional Decision Rules for Juries

Catherine T. Struve
University of Pennsylvania Law School



37 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 659 (2006)
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 06-22

Abstract:     
Recent scholarship on constitutional decision rules distinguishes courts from other constitutional decision makers, but has not explored distinctions - within the judicial institution - between judges and juries. Correlatively, social science literature on jury comprehension has proposed methods for improving jury instructions, but that literature has not considered in any detail the doctrinal complexities of constitutional law. This Article, drawing upon both fields, presents an agenda for crafting constitutional decision rules specifically for juries. Implementing this agenda will enhance the adjudication of constitutional tort claims, and could also render constitutional doctrine more accessible to non-lawyers.

Keywords: jury, decision rules, civil rights, Section 1983

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: November 10, 2005 ; Last revised: February 03, 2009

Suggested Citation

Struve, Catherine T., Constitutional Decision Rules for Juries. 37 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 659 (2006); U of Penn Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 06-22. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=841265


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Catherine T. Struve (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3400 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 724
Downloads: 99
Download Rank: 79,389

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo7 in 0.109 seconds.