Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=842284
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (32)



 


 



Deconstruction's Legal Career


Jack M. Balkin


Yale University - Law School


Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, p. 101, 2005
Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 104

Abstract:     
This article describes law's encounter with deconstruction, and how it changed deconstruction. In the hands of lawyers, deconstruction became a set of rhetorical strategies for critiquing legal distinctions and showing their ideological character. Legal scholars used deconstructive arguments to offer normative prescriptions in ways quite different from literary critics or philosophers. Although in theory all texts and distinctions are deconstructable, legal scholars assumed that some interpretations were better than others. Legal deconstruction thus became a set of repeatable rhetorical practices used for pragmatic purposes; and it revealed that these rhetorical and pragmatic features were already present in literary and philosophical deconstruction.

Deconstruction's encounter with law also overturned several popular assumptions about deconstruction. First, legal deconstruction does not assert that legal texts have no meaning or that their meanings are indecipherable. Rather, it argues that texts are overflowing with meanings that point in different directions and emerge over time. Second, one deconstructs conceptual oppositions not to show that legal concepts have no boundaries, but that their boundaries are fluid and appear differently as the conceptual opposition is placed into new interpretive contexts. Legal deconstruction asserts that legal distinctions are nested oppositions - conceptual oppositions whose terms bear a relation of mutual dependence and differentiation; this complicated relationship is revealed as interpretive contexts change. Ideological drift, in which concepts change their political valence as they are repeatedly invoked at different points in history, is a special case of this phenomenon. Third, instead of asserting that legal doctrine is radically indeterminate, legal deconstruction suggests that social construction places ideological constraints on legal decisionmaking and helps produce the sense that some arguments are better than others. Finally, far from denying the existence of fundamental human values, legal deconstruction presupposes a transcendent value of justice which law attempts to express but always fails fully to articulate.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: deconstruction, jurisprudence, ideology, critical legal studies

JEL Classification: K11

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 13, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Balkin, Jack M., Deconstruction's Legal Career. Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, p. 101, 2005; Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 104. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=842284

Contact Information

Jack M. Balkin (Contact Author)
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
203-432-1620 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,658
Downloads: 513
Download Rank: 30,266
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  32

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 4.047 seconds