Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=842324
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Roper v. Simmons and Our Constitution in International Equipoise


Roger Paul Alford


Notre Dame Law School


UCLA Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2005

Abstract:     
In Roper v. Simmons, the Court unequivocally affirms the use of comparative constitutionalism to interpret the Eighth Amendment. It does not, however, provide an obvious theoretical basis to justify the practice. This Article searches for a theory to explain the comparativism in Roper using the theories advanced in the author's previous scholarship. It concludes that of the colorable candidates, natural law constitutionalism is the most plausible explanation, with the attendant problems associated therewith. The Article concludes with an analysis of the possible ramifications of the Court's comparative approach, suggesting that it may be pursuing a Constitution that is in international equipoise, with international values distributed liberally throughout our jurisprudence to ensure foreign and domestic equilibrium.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: comparative, constitution, international, roper, simmons, lawrence, death penalty, eighth amendment, constitutional comparativism

JEL Classification: K33, K19

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 13, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Alford, Roger Paul, Roper v. Simmons and Our Constitution in International Equipoise. UCLA Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=842324

Contact Information

Roger Paul Alford (Contact Author)
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,607
Downloads: 260
Download Rank: 68,021
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.282 seconds