|
||||
|
||||
One-Sided Contracts in Competitive Consumer Markets
Lucian A. Bebchuk Harvard University - Harvard Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) Richard A. Posner University of Chicago Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Michigan Law Review, Vol. 104, pp. 827-836, 2006 Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 534 Abstract: This paper shows that "one-sided" terms in standard contracts, which deny consumers a contractual benefit that seems efficient on average, may arise in competitive markets without informational problems (other than those of courts). A one-sided term might be an efficient response to situations in which courts cannot perfectly observe all the contingencies needed for an accurate implementation of a "balanced" contractual term when firms are more concerned about their reputation, and thus less inclined to behave opportunistically, than consumers are. We develop this explanation, discuss its positive and normative implications, and compare them to those of information-based explanations for one-sided terms.
Keywords: contracts, standard form contracts, contracts of adhesion, reputation, opportunism, observability JEL Classifications: D8, K12 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 10, 2005 ; Last revised: April 29, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.125 seconds.