|
||||
|
||||
One-Sided Contracts in Competitive Consumer MarketsLucian A. BebchukHarvard Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) Richard A. PosnerUniversity of Chicago Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Michigan Law Review, Vol. 104, pp. 827-836, 2006 Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 534 Abstract: This paper shows that "one-sided" terms in standard contracts, which deny consumers a contractual benefit that seems efficient on average, may arise in competitive markets without informational problems (other than those of courts). A one-sided term might be an efficient response to situations in which courts cannot perfectly observe all the contingencies needed for an accurate implementation of a "balanced" contractual term when firms are more concerned about their reputation, and thus less inclined to behave opportunistically, than consumers are. We develop this explanation, discuss its positive and normative implications, and compare them to those of information-based explanations for one-sided terms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13 Keywords: contracts, standard form contracts, contracts of adhesion, reputation, opportunism, observability JEL Classification: D8, K12 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 10, 2005 ; Last revised: April 29, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.891 seconds