Citations (1)


Footnotes (68)



Private Police and Democracy

David Alan Sklansky

Stanford University

American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 89, 2006
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 845144

The implications of private policing for democracy depend on the particular kind of private policing at issue, on the particular account of democracy we bring to bear, and on the functional relationship we assume between private and public policing. This paper explores each of these three levels of complexity, and it urges attention to two underappreciated ways in which private security may threaten democracy. The first is by dampening political support for public law enforcement committed, at least nominally, to protecting everyone against illegal violence. The result may be a system of policing even less egalitarian than the one we have today. The second is by aborting the largely unrealized project of democratizing the internal workings of police departments. The result of that may be to forfeit a promising set of avenues for making policing more effective, more humane, and more respectful of democratic process in the broader society.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: police, private security, privatization, democracy

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 22, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Sklansky, David Alan, Private Police and Democracy. American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 89, 2006; UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 845144. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=845144

Contact Information

David Alan Sklansky (Contact Author)
Stanford University ( email )
Stanford, CA 94305
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,491
Downloads: 499
Download Rank: 36,246
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  68

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.469 seconds