|
||||
|
||||
Ambiguity Aversion and the Criminal Process
Alex Stein Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Uzi Segal Boston College - Department of Economics Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 81, 2006 Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 142 Abstract: Ambiguity-aversion is a person's rational attitude towards the indeterminacy of the probability that attaches to his future prospects, both favorable and unfavorable. An ambiguity-averse person increases the probability of the unfavorable prospect, which is what criminal defendants typically do when they face a jury trial. The prosecution is not ambiguity-averse. Being a repeat player interested in the overall rate of convictions, it can depend upon any probability, however indeterminate it may be. The criminal process therefore is systematically affected by asymmetric ambiguity aversion, which the prosecution can exploit by forcing defendants into harsh plea bargains. Professors Segal and Stein examine this issue theoretically, empirically and doctrinally. They demonstrate that asymmetric ambiguity aversion foils criminal justice and propose a law reform that will fix this problem.
Keywords: ambiguity-aversion, risk-aversion, indeterminate probabilities, criminal law, criminal procedure, jury, bench trial, grand jury, double jeopardy, plea bargaining, empirical legal studies JEL Classifications: D63, D80, D81, K00, K14, K40, K41 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 14, 2005 ; Last revised: March 23, 2006Suggested Citation |
|
|||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.266 seconds.