The Role of Retributive Justice in the Common Law of Torts: A Descriptive Theory
University of Haifa - Faculty of Law; University of Oxford - Faculty of Law
Tennessee Law Review, Vol. 73, 2006
This article is the first academic attempt to explain in a systematic manner how the third-form-of-justice, usually thought of as one of the theoretical foundations of criminal law, operates within the law of torts. Tort jurisprudence is definitely not the natural habitat for retributive concerns. Since retributive justice is technically inconsistent with the corrective structure of tort law its role is (and probably ought to be) very limited. The article first explains the notion of retributive justice and defends the view that it constitutes a third form of justice, distinct from the classical Aristotelian forms. It then rejects monistic retributive theories of tort law, and argues that retributive justice penetrates the corrective pattern of tort law only within two conceptual paradigms: (1) the prevention of abominable disproportion paradigm, and (2) the preservation of criminal justice paradigm. It subsequently demonstrates this theory in a methodical manner with notable examples from various common-law jurisdictions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 106
Keywords: Tort law, retributive justice, corrective justice, negligence, criminal law
JEL Classification: K13Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 17, 2005
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds