SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (129)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Copyright Vs. Free Expression: The Case of Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing of Music in the United Kingdom

Robert Jacob Danay
Department of Justice - Government of Canada



8 Yale Journal of Law & Technology 32 (2005).

Abstract:     
This paper explores the extent to which the peer-to-peer (p2p) file-sharing of music is a form of communication protected from the restrictions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (U.K.) (CDPA) by the guarantee of free expression enshrined in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and incorporated into domestic law through the Human Rights Act 1998 (U.K.) (HRA). The paper first examines the protection offered to freedom of expression through the existing copyright scheme. It is asserted that due to a lack of context-sensitivity, mechanisms such as the idea-expression dichotomy must not be relied upon to deny the existence of prima facie breaches of Article 10(1) of the ECHR. Rather, such breaches must be acknowledged and justified (if possible) as being "necessary in a democratic society" under Article 10(2) of the ECHR. Next, the extent to which p2p music file-sharing represents an infringement under the terms of the CDPA (exclusive of any effect of the ECHR) is examined. It is concluded that such sharing does amount to an infringement under the Act and is not subject to any of the enumerated defences. The final part of the paper explores the extent to which the statutory restriction on file-sharing of music may be permitted under Article 10 of the ECHR. It is suggested that, for a number of reasons, the CDPA's restriction on free expression may not be "necessary in a democratic society" under Article 10(2) of the ECHR. As a result, should this statutory restriction be impugned in a U.K. courtroom in the context of p2p music file-sharing, such a court may be under an obligation to exculpate infringing parties under the "public interest" defence or to make a declaration of incompatibility under the HRA.

Keywords: human rights, human rights act, united kingdom, freedom of expression, european convention on human rights, file-sharing, music, downloading, peer-to-peer, p2p

JEL Classifications: K1, K10, K19, K30, K39, K42

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: November 15, 2005 ; Last revised: February 18, 2009

Suggested Citation

Danay, Robert Jacob, Copyright Vs. Free Expression: The Case of Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing of Music in the United Kingdom. 8 Yale Journal of Law & Technology 32 (2005).. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=847905


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Robert Jacob Danay (Contact Author)
Department of Justice - Government of Canada ( email )
900-840 Howe St.
Vancouver, Ontario V6Z 2S9
Canada
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,041
Downloads: 456
Download Rank: 16,235
Footnotes: 129

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.125 seconds.