Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=849564
 
 

References (35)



 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Daubert and the Proper Role for the Courts in Health, Safety, and Environmental Regulation


Thomas Owen McGarity


University of Texas at Austin - School of Law


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95, No. S1, pp. S92-S98, 2005
The Coronado Conference: Scientific Evidence and Public Policy Paper

Abstract:     
Assigning a Daubert-like gatekeeper role to courts engaged in judicial review of risk assessments prepared by federal agencies is a profoundly bad idea. I describe the role of courts in reviewing regulatory agency decisionmaking and explore the potential impact of incorporating Daubert principles into administrative law. A Daubert form of judicial review will prevent agencies from employing a weight of the evidence approach, forcing them to adopt a corpuscular approach that rewards efforts by regulatees to find and exaggerate flaws in individual scientific studies. Consequently, applying Daubert to federal agency decisionmaking will have a predictable impact on regulatory policy that runs directly counter to the precautionary policies that animate most health, safety and environmental statutes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Environmental law, Judicial Review, Weight of the evidence, Daubert

JEL Classification: G18, K23, K32

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 29, 2005  

Suggested Citation

McGarity, Thomas Owen, Daubert and the Proper Role for the Courts in Health, Safety, and Environmental Regulation. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95, No. S1, pp. S92-S98, 2005; The Coronado Conference: Scientific Evidence and Public Policy Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=849564

Contact Information

Thomas Owen McGarity (Contact Author)
University of Texas at Austin - School of Law ( email )
727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
512-232-1384 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 978
Downloads: 132
Download Rank: 127,071
References:  35
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.343 seconds