Daubert and the Proper Role for the Courts in Health, Safety, and Environmental Regulation
Thomas Owen McGarity
University of Texas at Austin - School of Law
American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95, No. S1, pp. S92-S98, 2005
The Coronado Conference: Scientific Evidence and Public Policy Paper
Assigning a Daubert-like gatekeeper role to courts engaged in judicial review of risk assessments prepared by federal agencies is a profoundly bad idea. I describe the role of courts in reviewing regulatory agency decisionmaking and explore the potential impact of incorporating Daubert principles into administrative law. A Daubert form of judicial review will prevent agencies from employing a weight of the evidence approach, forcing them to adopt a corpuscular approach that rewards efforts by regulatees to find and exaggerate flaws in individual scientific studies. Consequently, applying Daubert to federal agency decisionmaking will have a predictable impact on regulatory policy that runs directly counter to the precautionary policies that animate most health, safety and environmental statutes.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 7
Keywords: Environmental law, Judicial Review, Weight of the evidence, Daubert
JEL Classification: G18, K23, K32Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 29, 2005
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.531 seconds