|
||||
|
||||
Stuck on Gold: Real Exchange Rate Volatility and the Rise and Fall of the Gold StandardNatalia Chernyshoffaffiliation not provided to SSRN David S. JacksSimon Fraser University (SFU) - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Alan M. TaylorUniversity of Virginia - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) November 2005 NBER Working Paper No. w11795 Abstract: Did adoption of the gold standard exacerbate or diminish macroeconomic volatility? Supporters thought so, critics thought not, and theory offers ambiguous messages. A hard exchange-rate regime such as the gold standard might limit monetary shocks if it ties the hands of policy makers. But any decision to forsake exchange-rate flexibility might compromise shock absorption in a world of real shocks and nominal stickiness. A simple model shows how a lack of flexibility can be discerned in the transmission of terms of trade shocks. Evidence on the relationship between real exchange rate volatility and terms of trade volatility from the late nineteenth and early twentieth century exposes a dramatic change. The classical gold standard did absorb shocks, but the interwar gold standard did not, and this historical pattern suggests that the interwar gold standard was a poor regime choice.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32 working papers seriesDate posted: November 29, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.500 seconds