Transnational Guidance in Terrorism Cases
Laura E. Little
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2006-06
George Washington University International Law Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2006
This article advocates using transnational materials as guides to adjudicating federal terrorism cases. Reacting to United States Supreme Court decisions using comparative law sources, Congress has sought to dramatically curtail federal court freedom to consider materials from other countries, from international organizations, and other international sources. This article argues that this approach fails to recognize that careful consideration of international and comparative laws is a rational adaptation to the social and global realities of transnational terrorism. The article outlines four main reasons that federal courts should use transnational materials when adjudicating federal terrorism cases: (1) the practice serves common sense; (2) the practice reflects methodologically good judging; (3) the practice serves the United States constitutional structure; and (4) the practice promotes the rule of law and world governance.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32
Keywords: terrorism, transnational norms, comparative law, constitutional law, national security, foreign relations law, international law
JEL Classification: K10, K14, K33, K42Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 7, 2005
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.593 seconds