Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=863004
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (186)



 


 



The Destruction of the Holistic Approach to Admissions: The Pernicious Effects of Rankings


Alex M. Johnson Jr.


University of Virginia - School of Law


Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 81, 2006

Abstract:     
In this Article, I contend that the Supreme Court's recent decisions in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger, affirming the continuing use of affirmative action in higher education in certain contexts, require selective educational institutions (law schools in particular) to use an evaluative admissions process or holistic approach. Per this approach, soft variables, including race and ethnicity, must be taken into account as part of the admissions process in order to produce a diverse student body. The reason why such an approach must be used in admissions is that members of underrepresented groups continue to score about one standard deviation below that of white applicants on high-stakes, standardized tests such as the LSAT.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: Affirmative Action, Law School, Admissions, Legal Education, Race and the Law, LSAT, LSAC, Gratz v. Bollinger, Grutter v. Bollinger

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 7, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Johnson, Alex M., The Destruction of the Holistic Approach to Admissions: The Pernicious Effects of Rankings. Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 81, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=863004

Contact Information

Alex M. Johnson Jr. (Contact Author)
University of Virginia - School of Law
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,276
Downloads: 194
Download Rank: 90,788
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  186

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds