Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=869407
 
 

Citations (13)



 
 

Footnotes (259)



 


 



Transparency and Participation in Criminal Procedure


Stephanos Bibas


University of Pennsylvania Law School


New York University Law Review, Vol. 86, p. 911, 2006
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 06-28
U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-30
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 117

Abstract:     
The insiders who run the criminal justice system - judges, police, and especially prosecutors - have information, power, and self-interests that greatly influence the criminal justice process and outcomes. Outsiders - crime victims, bystanders, and most of the general public - find the system frustratingly opaque, insular, and unconcerned with proper retribution. As a result, a spiral ensues: insiders twist rules as they see fit, outsiders try to constrain them, and insiders find new ways to evade or manipulate the new rules. The gulf between insiders and outsiders undercuts the instrumental, moral, and expressive efficacy of criminal procedure in serving the criminal law's substantive goals. The gulf clouds the law's deterrent and expressive message and efficacy in healing victims; it impairs trust in and the legitimacy of the law; it provokes increasingly Draconian reactions by outsiders; and it hinders public monitoring of agency costs. The most promising solutions are to better inform crime victims and other affected locals and to give them larger roles in criminal justice. It might be possible to better monitor and check insiders, but the prospects for empowering and educating the general public are dim.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: criminal procedure, criminal justice, prosecutors, police, transparency, participation, punishment, trust, legitimacy, monitoring, agency costs

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 13, 2005 ; Last revised: April 3, 2009

Suggested Citation

Bibas, Stephanos, Transparency and Participation in Criminal Procedure. New York University Law Review, Vol. 86, p. 911, 2006; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 06-28; U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-30; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 117. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=869407

Contact Information

Stephanos Bibas (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-746-2297 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.upenn.edu/cf/faculty/sbibas/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,791
Downloads: 324
Download Rank: 51,887
Citations:  13
Footnotes:  259

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.265 seconds