|
||||
|
||||
Social Security, Generational Justice, and Long-Term DeficitsNeil H. BuchananGeorge Washington University Law School November 9, 2010 Tax Law Review, Vol. 58, p. 275, 2005 Rutgers School of Law Working Paper No. 005 Abstract: This paper assesses current methods for evaluating the long-term viability and desirability of government activities, especially Social Security and other big-ticket budget items. I reach four conclusions: (1) There are several simple ways to improve the current debate about fiscal policy by adjusting our crude deficit measures, improvements which ought not to be controversial; (2) separately measuring Social Security's long-term balance is inappropriate and misleading; (3) the methods available to measure very long-term government financing (Fiscal Gaps and their cousins, Generational Accounts) are of very limited value in setting public policy today, principally because there is no reliable baseline of the government's likely future expenditures and receipts; and therefore (4) the government's current annual and 10-year deficit projections, while highly imperfect, are nonetheless the best measure available for assessing fiscal policy, especially compared with Fiscal Gaps and Generational Accounts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52 Keywords: Deficits, National Debt, Generational Accounting, Fiscal Gap JEL Classification: E60, E62, H50, H55, H60, H61, H62, H63 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: December 20, 2005 ; Last revised: November 10, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.766 seconds