SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (386)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Judicial Participation in Plea Negotiations: A Comparative View

Jenia Iontcheva Turner
Southern Methodist University (SMU) - Dedman School of Law



American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 94, 2006

Abstract:     
Current rules in most U.S. jurisdictions prohibit judges from becoming involved in plea negotiations and limit the judges' role to reviewing a plea bargain once it is presented by the parties. The enclosed article surveys three systems that provide for more significant judicial involvement - Germany, Florida, and Connecticut - and suggests that a judge's early input into plea negotiations can render the final disposition more accurate and procedurally just. Based on interviews with practitioners and a review of the case law, the article outlines a model for greater judicial involvement in plea negotiations.

Keywords: plea bargaining, plea negotiations, judges, criminal procedure, comparative

JEL Classifications: K00, K14, K33, K40, K42

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: December 28, 2005 ; Last revised: June 23, 2006

Suggested Citation

Iontcheva Turner, Jenia, Judicial Participation in Plea Negotiations: A Comparative View. American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 94, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=871979


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Jenia Iontcheva Turner (Contact Author)
Southern Methodist University (SMU) - Dedman School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,171
Downloads: 193
Download Rank: 44,066
Footnotes: 386

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.312 seconds.