Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=871979
 
 

Footnotes (386)



 


 



Judicial Participation in Plea Negotiations: A Comparative View


Jenia Iontcheva Turner


Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law


American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 94, 2006

Abstract:     
Current rules in most U.S. jurisdictions prohibit judges from becoming involved in plea negotiations and limit the judges' role to reviewing a plea bargain once it is presented by the parties. The enclosed article surveys three systems that provide for more significant judicial involvement - Germany, Florida, and Connecticut - and suggests that a judge's early input into plea negotiations can render the final disposition more accurate and procedurally just. Based on interviews with practitioners and a review of the case law, the article outlines a model for greater judicial involvement in plea negotiations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 70

Keywords: plea bargaining, plea negotiations, judges, criminal procedure, comparative

JEL Classification: K00, K14, K33, K40, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 28, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Iontcheva Turner, Jenia, Judicial Participation in Plea Negotiations: A Comparative View. American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 94, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=871979

Contact Information

Jenia Iontcheva Turner (Contact Author)
Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,291
Downloads: 355
Download Rank: 46,000
Footnotes:  386

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds