Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=873881
 
 

Footnotes (164)



 


 



Makeup and Women at Work


Devon W. Carbado


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

G. Mitu Gulati


Duke University - School of Law

Gowri Ramachandran


Southwestern Law School


Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL), 2006
University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law Research Paper No. 06-01
Florida State University College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 178
Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 96

Abstract:     
This is a story about gender, makeup and the law. Darlene Jespersen, a bartender, was fired from her job of fifteen years at Harrah's Casino because she refused to wear makeup. Jespersen responded with a lawsuit that traveled to the Ninth Circuit, where she was represented by LAMBDA Legal, the preeminent gay rights litigation organization. Makeup, some will argue, is a trivial thing. Why would Darlene Jespersen (choose to) lose her job over makeup? More generally, how did favoring (as opposed to prohibiting) a practice that so many women (but not men) engage in become the basis for a sex discrimination suit? Why was LAMBDA involved? What is at stake? Isn't makeup a vehicle for women to express their autonomy and individuality? Finally, do we really want the federal government involved in policing employers' makeup policies?

Because anti-discrimination law has been wedded to a biological conception of sex, it has not grappled well with sex discrimination cases that implicate makeup and grooming. This is particularly problematic in today's labor market because few contemporary employers are likely to exclude all women from their workplace; they are far more likely to engage in intra-gender screening based on whether a woman's self presentation is in accord with social scripts about gender normative behavior. Using Jespersen as a point of departure, we reveal how makeup is implicated in this screening process and explain why its regulation ought to be conceptualized as a form of discrimination on the basis of sex.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: anti-discrimination laws, discrimination on the basis of sex

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 5, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Carbado, Devon W. and Gulati, G. Mitu and Ramachandran, Gowri, Makeup and Women at Work. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL), 2006; University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law Research Paper No. 06-01; Florida State University College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 178; Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 96. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=873881

Contact Information

Devon W. Carbado (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-825-3365 (Phone)
310-825-6023 (Fax)
Gaurang Mitu Gulati
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Gowri Ramachandran
Southwestern Law School ( email )
3050 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90010
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,770
Downloads: 589
Download Rank: 24,741
Footnotes:  164

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 1.031 seconds